Electronic Arts steht erneut eine Klage bevor. Der Grund sind Lootboxen in Spielen, unter anderem im FIFA-Ultimate-Team-Modus. Dieses Mal. Sind Lootboxen vergleichbar mit Ü-Eiern? EAs Manager für die Benelux-Länder, Dirk Scholing, zeigte sich enttäuscht. EA vertritt die Ansicht. Wegen den sogenannten Lootboxen musste sich Electronic Arts erneut vor Gericht verantworten. Das gefällte Urteil sorgt dafür, dass.
FIFA 21: EA droht nächste Klage wegen Lootboxen im Ultimate TeamElectronic Arts: Lootbox-Sammelklage beschuldigt EA, ein "illegales Gaming-System" betrieben zu haben. Electronic Arts (Unternehmen) von. Ein Gericht in Den Haag wies den Einspruch von EA gegen die niederländische Glücksspielbehörde zurück, die Lootboxen in FIFA als. Eine Lootbox (auch als Loot Crate, Prize Crate oder Beutebox bekannt) ist ein virtueller Der Börsenwert von Electronic Arts fiel um 3,1 Milliarden US-Dollar.
Ea Lootbox Gaming reps at UK parliamentary panel also answer charges of addictive game design. VideoUK Parliament Discussing Predatory Lootbox / Microtransaction with EA / Epic Games
Ryan says loot boxes are the most debated topic in the gaming community, describing the conversation about their place in games as "toxic". EA's game Star Wars Battlefront II, which was released in , was criticised by gamers because players could find powerful items or characters in loot boxes they paid for.
It took other gamers many hours to find the same things - making online play much easier for those with cash to spend in the game.
In early , EA removed certain items from loot boxes after the negative response from players and critics and in an attempt to make gameplay a bit more balanced.
Earlier this year, Democrat senators in the US proposed legislation on loot boxes and games described as being "pay-to-win". But the comparison to Kinder Eggs was quite ironic, given that the chocolate eggs were banned in the U.
The British Parliament is investigating loot boxes over concern that they constitute gambling, and the potential harm that could cause to children, citing anecdotal evidence and research that call loot boxes addictive.
Loot boxes, microtransactions, and pay-to-win mechanisms have come under mainstream scrutiny over the past year. Loot boxes have been likened to gambling, a comparison that Electronic Arts and the Entertainment Software Association dispute.
Gamers have seen developers create new ways to get microtransactions into games such as battle passes. Players do seem to like these and they are less controversial than loot boxes, so fans can expect them to become more popular with companies like EA.
The bill has quickly become a divisive issue amongst the gaming community. Many developers, such as EA, Blizzard, and Activision have continued to call for the repeal of the bill, and other legislation like it, saying that loot boxes are not gambling or gambling addiction, and should not be regulated as such.
The comments were met with outrage across the gaming community, with many seeing EA as out of touch as the willfully misrepresented what loot boxes really are.
Both companies also denied that lot boxes lead to gambling addiction, and refused to comment on the appropriate amount of time their games should be played in a single sitting.
It is really not something that we could look at and say, 'Well this person played too many hours and therefore it is unhealthy. How can I say that?
Has a doctor said that playing for 10 hours straight is unhealthy? It is difficult to characterize what excessive is.
By late , a large number of core AAA games from key franchises released near this time, including Middle-earth: Shadow of War , Forza Motorsport 7 and NBA 2K18 , with varying mechanics in their loot-box systems, led to critical review of the practice starting in October Due to reactions to loot boxes starting in late , some developers and publishers have pulled loot boxes from their games.
Loot boxes with random content are still available as free in-game rewards, but, after the March patch, cosmetic options are available for direct purchase with real money as well.
Loot boxes are considered part of the compulsion loop of game design to keep players invested in a game. Proponents for the use of loot boxes have countered complaints that they are gambling systems by likening them to opening collectible toys such as Hatchimals  or booster packs from physical collectible card games CCGs like Magic: the Gathering.
In the United States CCGs have been subject to previous legal challenges related to if they are a form of gambling, but were not found liable.
Some have argued the increased use of loot boxes in games since Overwatch was due to the perception that the act of opening loot boxes is an exciting element for a game for both the player, and those watching the player either on YouTube videos or through live streaming , creating a number of multi-million subscriber video streams solely dedicated to opening loot boxes.
Games with randomised in-game rewards, including those from loot boxes, and which offer the means to trade these items with other players, are known to attract the use of skin gambling.
In skin gambling, these customization items, "skins", become a black market virtual currency among players and operators of websites that allow players to trade the items for real-world funds, or to use those items to gamble on esports or other games of chance ; subsequently these activities have been identified as gambling by legal authorities, and several legal challenges arose in the last half of to stop this practice.
Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , updated in to include randomised loot drops from in-games, has been the most visible example of skin gambling by mid Some loot-box systems within free games are criticised as "pay-to-win" systems, and may be derogatorily referred to as "pay-to-loot".
In these cases, the contents of the loot box contain items, beyond superficial customization options, which directly affect gameplay, such as booster packs for a digital collectible card game, and with the impact on gameplay proportional to the item's rarity.
This can tie the quality of a player's ability to compete with others to the random generation systems of the loot pack, and may drive players into paying for additional loot boxes to obtain high-rarity items to fairly compete with others.
Some commentators expressed concern that for these types of loot-box models to be successful for the publishers, the game itself has to be designed around promoting and encouraging the player to purchase loot boxes, which fundamentally impacts core game design principles and may weaken the underlying game mechanics.
For example, Middle-earth: Shadow of War has a second, true ending requiring the player to gain many more stronger allies to meet its higher difficulty.
While the developers playtested the balance of the game without the loot-box system activated, assuring the game could be completed without additional monetisation, reviewers found that the game required a great deal of time needed to complete numerous additional missions for the chance to acquire stronger allies, and with the consistent presence of the in-game market for loot boxes, made it difficult to avoid the allure of paying real money to bypass this grinding, creating a negative on the overall experience.
The implementation of some loot-box systems are considered anti-consumer by some players and commentators. Full-priced games which already provide downloadable content and then include a loot-box system have been heavily criticised by players.
Developers and publishers consider loot boxes part of a necessary process of monetising AAA video games beyond their initial sale. Monetisation schemes like loot boxes can help provide long tail revenue, well after the release of the game.
Developers noted that the decision to include loot boxes in a game, and how they will be priced in real-world funds, may come from their publisher or upper management, but the implementation of their mechanics, including what they include, how they are doled out, and the like, are frequently set by the developers themselves.
Blizzard Entertainment 's Overwatch 's loot box implementation does not impact gameplay, but other aspects of the system are subject to criticism.
A free crate is given to the player each time the player reaches enough experience to level-up, but the rate of experience acquisition varies with player skill.
While any item contains only cosmetic appeal and has no influence on gameplay, the desire for a specific item creates a strong incentive to purchase additional crates.
Principally an online multiplayer shooter, Battlefront II was developed to eliminate the "season pass" approach that the original game had used, which was found to have split the player base over those that paid for the added content and those that did not.
These schemes include a loot-box system providing, among other rewards, "Star Cards" that provide boosts to a specific character class, and which have tiered levels tied to rarity that provide greater boosts.
Because these higher-tier Star Cards give direct advantages to players willing to acquire many loot boxes with real money than at the rate one would obtain simply playing the game, its loot-box system at the time of its open beta period had been described as one of the more egregious "pay-to-win" systems for a full-price game.
EA did re-evaluate this approach in response to criticism, and prior to full release, reworked the loot-box system so that some items still offered in loot boxes like Star Cards could also be earned through other routes such as in-game achievements, in-game currency, or through direct monetary purchase.
The combined loot-box and micro-transaction systems, all elements of "pay to win" schemes, drew even more criticism. Just hours before the game's official launch, EA and DICE temporarily disabled all micro-transaction purchases until they figured out a way to offer these systems in a favorable manner for consumers; DICE stated: "We will now spend more time listening, adjusting, balancing, and tuning" before they are reintroduced.
Disney, knowing the franchise draws in younger players, feared the loot-box systems would contribute towards gambling behavior in children.
The player reaction to Battlefront 's loot-box system led to the Belgian Gambling Commission to evaluate the nature of loot boxes specifically in Battlefront.
In the United States, it generated legislative debates about a potential sales ban within Hawaii and some other US states.
Analysts expect that EA will have to re-evaluate how they monetise games in the future to avoid similar backlashes, which may further reduce future revenues.
This, coupled with the removal of micro-transactions from the game while they readdressed the loot-box approach, led to the game missing EA's revenue projections for that quarter.
And we won't. Electronic Arts also published the FIFA series of association football games in annual installments, using the appearances and attributes of the real-world athletes in the teams on the league.
Part of more recent entries in the system include its "Ultimate Team" mode, where players can form their own teams by collecting "cards" of these players, which have been offered through virtual card packs that can be purchased with in-game currency or real-world funds Points currency.
While this is a similar mechanism to other games using loot box mechanics, the use here is criticised due to the fact that cards earned from one version of the game do not carry over into the next year's version.
Thus, players must work to regain a competitive team by re-earning in-game credits or spending more money by buying additional points, with the potential to continue that cycle each year.
Because of their use of random chance to gain items after committing real-world funds, games using loot boxes may be considered a form of gambling.
Games with loot-box systems have become subject to regulation in several Asian countries, while questions of the legality of loot boxes are under consideration in some Western ones.
In December , China's Ministry of Culture announced legislation which required "online game publishers" to publicly release from May onwards the "draw probability of all virtual items and services".
The law also banned game publishers from directly selling "lottery tickets" such as loot boxes. In June , Blizzard Entertainment announced that, "in line with the new laws and regulations", loot boxes in their game Overwatch would no longer be available for purchase in China.
Players would instead buy in-game currency and receive loot boxes as a "gift" for making the purchase.
Effective November , China's General Administration of Press and Publication prohibited the sale of loot boxes to users under eight years of age and restricted their sale to older users under 18 years of age to a maximum monthly spending limit ranging from renminbi to renminbi.
This was done not by introducing any new legislation, but by issuing a legal opinion that virtual items could be considered "prizes" under existing legislation written in to prevent the complete gacha practice in the context of baseball trading cards.
Within a month of the opinion being issued, all major Japanese game publishers had removed complete gacha rules from their games, though many developers found ways around these rules.
In March , members of South Korea 's National Assembly , led by the Liberty Korea Party , proposed amendments to the country's existing games industry regulation that would require games companies to release "information on the type, composition ratio, and acquisition probability" of items granted by loot boxes.
In October , Singapore's parliament passed The Remote Gambling Act, which introduced a ban on unlicensed gambling websites and fines for anyone violating it.
The law's definition of gambling included staking "virtual credits, virtual coins, virtual tokens, virtual objects or any similar thing that is purchased In response to games industry lobbying home affairs minister S.
Iswaran clarified the law in parliament, stating that "the Bill does not intend to cover social games in which players do not play to acquire a chance of winning money and where the game design does not allow the player to convert in-game credits to money or real merchandise outside the game".
The minister also specifically excluded platforms which offered "virtual currencies which can be used to buy or redeem other entertainment products", such as Steam , from the provisions of the bill.
The fact is that the line between social gaming and gambling is increasingly becoming blurred. What may appear benign today can quickly morph into something a lot more sinister tomorrow in response to market opportunities and consumer trends.
That is why the legislation is cast broadly. Within Australia, games with loot boxes would fall under gambling restrictions if they can be played "for money or anything else of value"; the question remains if items that only exist within game have "value" that can be quantified, even if this is related to an item's prestige.
The commission has suggested "an immediate R rating " for any games which feature loot boxes as a solution to this limitation. The investigation, which started in August , evaluated the use of loot boxes in video games and considered them under issues related to gambling and effects on children.
The Committee recommended that games with loot boxes be labeled to warn of parental guidance and indicate that they contain "in-game gambling content" and suggest that such games be rated to represent the legal gambling age in the country.
A February report from the Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs that focused on Internet content that should be blocked behind age verification gates recommended that the Office of the eSafety Commissioner or similar body "report to the Australian government on options for restricting access to loot boxes and other simulated gambling elements in computer and video games to adults aged 18 years or over, including through the use of mandatory age verification".
By August , the Australian Classification Board had updated it regulations that games with any microtransaction, including loot boxes, must be labeled on its cover as containing "in-game purchases" as part of the ratings classification.
The Gambling Commission within the Department of Internal Affairs for New Zealand stated, in response to a citizen's email, that currently in their view "loot boxes do not meet the legal definition of gambling", but are reviewing the situation as it progresses.
In March , the UK's Gambling Commission issued a position paper "Virtual currencies, esports and social casino gaming".
In our view, the ability to convert in-game items into cash, or to trade them for other items of value , means they attain a real world value and become articles of money or money's worth.
Where facilities for gambling are offered using such items, a licence is required in exactly the same manner as would be expected in circumstances where somebody uses or receives casino chips as a method of payment for gambling, which can later be exchanged for cash.
In August , the commission opened an investigation into skin gambling. Miller further stated that even if other countries were to pass laws or regulate loot boxes, the Commission would still need to follow UK's laws.
In October , a month prior to the Battlefront II controversy, MP Daniel Zeichner of Cambridge, on behalf of a constituent, submitted a written parliamentary question "to ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport DCMS , what steps she plans to take to help protect vulnerable adults and children from illegal gambling, in-game gambling and loot boxes within computer games".